Back in August, when he was seeking the Democratic nomination, Obama voted against the Protect America Act. Therefore, had Obama had his way, there never would have been any PAA in the first place, and therefore, there never would have been any PAA orders possible. Having voted against the PAA last August, how can Obama now claim that he considers it important that the PAA orders not expire? How can he be eager to avoid the expiration of surveillance orders which he opposed authorizing in the first place?
[From Suburban Guerrilla » Blog Archive » Spinning]
"Postpartisan" is just a newer, fancier, more liberal-appealing word for Clinton-era triangulation - same old politics with better marketing.
No comments:
Post a Comment