3.05.2008

Oh oh, maybe the "surge" isn't working so well after all


The Bush administration says the 2002 congressional authorization to go to war in Iraq gives it the authority to conduct combat operations in Iraq and negotiate far-reaching agreements with the current Iraqi government without consulting Congress.



The assertion, jointly made Tuesday by U.S. Ambassador David Satterfield and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Mary Beth Long, drew an incredulous reaction from Democrats on a Joint House committee during a hearing on future U.S. commitments to Iraq.



“It's the view of the administration that as long as there’s trouble in Iraq that you have authorization of this Congress to continue there in perpetuity and define trouble as you desire?” asked Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y.



“We have authorization to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” Satterfield replied. “The situation in Iraq continues to present a threat to the United States.”

[From Bush officials: Congress irrelevant on Iraq - Army News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports - Army Times]

A threat to the United States? Bunky, when did that happen? What happened to all that everything-is-swell-in-Baghdad-now? Incredulous is not the word!



No comments: